This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by 
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
-
Posts
-
How are other jurisdictions interpreting Sec 103.1 second set of exceptions #2 ??
We occasionally come across this in older homes in town where the owner wants to keep the original look of the front porch with the 30″ guardrail and non-compliant baluster spacing. This code section is more concerned with structural integrity of the deck/porch including the rails and guards than the secondary concern of falling/climbing over or through.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.